1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 191 U.S.
  5. 191 U.S. 499 (1903)
 

DEPOSIT BANK v. FRANKFORT

No. 33.

191 U.S. 499 (1903)

24 S.Ct. 154

48 L.Ed. 276

DEPOSIT BANK v. FRANKFORT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 14, 1903.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frank Chinn, with whom Mr. D.W. Lindsey was on the brief, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. W.H. Julian, with whom Mr. Ira Julian and Mr. T.H. Crockett were on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE DAY, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

The so-called Hewitt law, set forth in the foregoing statement, has given rise to much litigation in the courts of Kentucky, as well as in those of the United States. At one time it was held by the Court of Appeals of Kentucky that its provisions, when complied with by the bank seeking to avail itself of its privileges, constituted...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases