1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 191 U.S.
  5. 191 U.S. 461 (1903)
 

BALTIMORE & POTOMAC R.R. v. LANDRIGAN

No. 71.

191 U.S. 461 (1903)

24 S.Ct. 137

48 L.Ed. 262

BALTIMORE & POTOMAC R.R. CO. v. LANDRIGAN.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 7, 1903.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Frederic D. McKenney and Mr. J. Spalding Flannery, with whom Mr. Wayne McVeagh was on the brief, for plaintiffs in error:

Mr. J.J. Darlington and Mr. Charles A. Douglass, with whom Mr. Joseph D. Wright was on the brief, for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The correctness of the ruling in denying the motion to instruct the jury to find a verdict for the plaintiffs in error depends upon the correctness of the ruling in granting or refusing the special instructions prayed. The principles embraced in them are but specifications of the legal propositions contained in the motion and upon which its soundness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases