1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 187 U.S.
  5. 187 U.S. 371 (1902)
 

PAM-TO-PEE v. UNITED STATES

No. 211.

187 U.S. 371 (1902)

23 S.Ct. 142

47 L.Ed. 221

PAM-TO-PEE v. UNITED STATES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 22, 1902.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. John B. Shipman for appellants.

Mr. Special Attorney William H. Button for appellees. Mr. Assistant Attorney General Pradt was with him on the brief.

MR. JUSTICE BREWER, after making the foregoing statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

There is an apparent hardship in the result of this litigation, but one which we are constrained to believe the plaintiffs are chiefly responsible for, and which can be relieved only by the action of Congress. Two sets of claimants appeared in the former suits, each represented by separate counsel, and after a consolidation the litigation proceeded only so far as to determine...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases