1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 174 U.S.
  5. 174 U.S. 125 (1899)
 

AUTEN v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK

No. 206.

174 U.S. 125 (1899)

19 S.Ct. 628

43 L.Ed. 920

AUTEN, v. UNITED STATES NATIONAL BANK OF NEW YORK.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 24, 1899.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Sterling R. Cockrill for plaintiff in error.

Mr. John Fletcher for defendant in error. Mr. W.C. Ratcliffe was on his brief.

MR. JUSTICE McKENNA, after making the above statement, delivered the opinion of the court.

1. To sustain the motion to dismiss, it is contended that the jurisdiction of the case depends on diversity of citizenship, and hence that the judgment of the Circuit Court of Appeals is final. But one of the defendants (plaintiff in error), though a citizen of a different State from the plaintiff in the action (defendant in error)...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases