1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 171 U.S.
  5. 171 U.S. 1 (1898)
 

SCHOLLENBERGER v. PENNSYLVANIA

Nos. 86, 87, 88.

171 U.S. 1 (1898)

18 S.Ct. 757

43 L.Ed. 49

SCHOLLENBERGER, v. PENNSYLVANIA. PAUL, v. PENNSYLVANIA. PAUL, v. PENNSYLVANIA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided May 23, 1898.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William D. Guthrie for plaintiffs in error. Mr. Richard C. Dale, Mr. Henry R. Edmunds and Mr. Albert H. Veeder were on his brief.

Mr. John G. Johnson for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE PECKHAM, after stating the facts, delivered the opinion of the court.

Counsel in behalf of the Commonwealth rests the validity of the statute in question upon two principal grounds:

(1.) That oleomargarine is a newly invented or discovered article, and that each State has the right in the case of a newly invented or discovered food product to determine for its citizens the question whether it is wholesome and non-deceptive, and neither the Congress...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases