1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 156 U.S.
  5. 156 U.S. 361 (1895)
 

WALDRON v. WALDRON

No. 97.

156 U.S. 361 (1895)

15 S.Ct. 383

39 L.Ed. 453

WALDRON, v. WALDRON.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 4, 1895.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. William H. Barnum, Mr. H.J. Caldwell and Mr. Louis J. Pierson for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Charles H. Aldrich for defendant in error, to the points on which the case turned in this court, said:

MR. JUSTICE WHITE, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The motion to dismiss or affirm is without merit. The signing of the bill of exceptions after the expiration of the term at which the judgment was rendered, was lawful if done by consent of parties given during that term. Hunnicutt v. Peyton, 102 U.S. 333; Davis v. Patrick,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases