SEABURY v. AM ENDE

No. 285.

152 U.S. 561 (1894)

14 S.Ct. 683

38 L.Ed. 553

SEABURY, v. AM ENDE.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 2, 1894.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edwin H. Brown and Mr. Norman T.M. Melliss, for appellant, as to the points considered in the opinion of the court, said:

Mr. Arthur v. Briesen for appellee.


MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The specification and claim of the patentee were in the following terms:

"This invention has for its objects to combine the various advantages of cotton-fibre with those possessed by boracic acid and glycerine for preserving animal and vegetable matter from decay.

"Heretofore boracic acid has been used as a preservative agent in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases