1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 153 U.S.
  5. 153 U.S. 177 (1894)
 

ERHARDT v. STEINHARDT

Not in source.

153 U.S. 177 (1894)

14 S.Ct. 775

38 L.Ed. 678

ERHARDT, v. STEINHARDT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Argued April 2, 1894.

Decided April 23, 1894.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Assistant Attorney General Whitney for plaintiff in error.

Mr. Edward Hartley for defendant in error.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

Counsel for plaintiff in error concedes that the bitters in question are proprietary preparations, and would be dutiable as such if there were no other governing clause; but contends that, as between the paragraph relating to proprietary preparations, and the paragraph relating to cordials, liqueurs, and other similar spirituous beverages...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases