1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 150 U.S.
  5. 150 U.S. 361 (1893)
 

EUSTIS v. BOLLES

No. 74.

150 U.S. 361 (1893)

14 S.Ct. 131

37 L.Ed. 1111

EUSTIS, v. BOLLES.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 20, 1893.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Conrad Reno, (with whom was Mr. William A. Macleod on the brief,) for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Edwin B. Hale, (with whom was Mr. James B. Richardson on the brief,) for defendants in error.

MR. JUSTICE SHIRAS, after stating the case as above reported, delivered the opinion of the court.

It is settled law that, to give this court jurisdiction of a writ of error to a state court, it must appear affirmatively, not only that a Federal question was presented for decision by the state court, but that its decision was necessary to the determination of the cause, and that it was actually decided adversely to the party claiming a right under the Federal laws...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases