1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 128 U.S.
  5. 128 U.S. 514 (1888)
 

MENENDEZ v. HOLT

No. 77.

128 U.S. 514 (1888)

9 S.Ct. 143

32 L.Ed. 526

MENENDEZ v. HOLT.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided December 10, 1888.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Arthur v. Briesen for appellants.

Mr. Rowland Cox for appellees.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE FULLER, after stating the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

A reversal of the decree in this case is asked on the grounds that the words "La Favorita," as used by the complainants, cannot be protected as a trade-mark; that there has been no infringement; that the words had been used as a brand before being used by Holt & Co.; that the title of Holt & Co. was not superior to that of S.O. Ryder...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases