1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 116 U.S.
  5. 116 U.S. 671 (1886)
 

HIGGINS v. McCREA

Not in source.

116 U.S. 671 (1886)

6 S.Ct. 557

29 L.Ed. 764

HIGGINS & Another, v. McCREA.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided March 1, 1886.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. C.C. Bonney and Mr. Francis J. Wing for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Stevenson Burke and Mr. William B. Sanders for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE WOODS delivered the opinion of the court. After stating the facts as above reported, he continued:

It is not disputed that if the transactions out of which this suit arose were of the character described in the counter-claim and testimony of the defendant, they fell under the ban of section 130 of chapter 38 of the Revised Statutes of Illinois of 1885, page 405, which was in force when the transactions took place. That section, so far as applicable to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases