1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 119 U.S.
  5. 119 U.S. 149 (1886)
 

MINNEAPOLIS, &C., R'Y v. COLUMBUS R'G MILL

Not in source.

119 U.S. 149 (1886)

7 S.Ct. 168

30 L.Ed. 376

MINNEAPOLIS AND ST. LOUIS RAILWAY, v. COLUMBUS ROLLING MILL.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided November 29, 1886.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr Eppa Hunton for plaintiff in error. Mr. C.N. Olds and Mr. L.J. Critchfield filed a brief for same.

Mr. Richard A. Harrison, for defendant in error, submitted on his brief.

MR. JUSTICE GRAY, after making the foregoing statement of the case, delivered the opinion of the court.

The rules of law which govern this case are well settled. As no contract is complete without the mutual assent of the parties, an offer to sell imposes no obligation until it is accepted according to its terms. So long as the offer has been neither accepted nor rejected, the negotiation remains open, and imposes no obligation...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases