1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 104 U.S.
  5. 104 U.S. 735 (1882)
 

POTT v. ARTHUR

Not in source.

104 U.S. 735 (1882)

26 L.Ed. 909

POTT, v. ARTHUR.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 6, 1882.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Edward Hartley and Mr. Walter H. Coleman for the plaintiffs in error.

The Solicitor-General for the defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

This was an action brought by James Pott, Edwin Young, and James B. Young, against Arthur, the collector of customs of New York, to recover back duties paid on books imported in August, 1874. A duty of twenty-five per cent ad valorem was exacted; whilst the plaintiffs claim that they should have been required to pay only ninety per cent of that amount, or twenty-two and a half per cent ad valorem.<...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases