1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 94 U.S.
  5. 94 U.S. 695 (1877)
 

CAWOOD PATENT

Not in source.

94 U.S. 695 (1877)

24 L.Ed. 238

CAWOOD PATENT. ILLINOIS CENTRAL RAILROAD COMPANY, v. TURRILL. MICHIGAN SOUTHERN AND NORTHERN INDIANA RAILROAD COMPANY. v. TURRILL. CHICAGO AND ALTON RAILROAD COMPANY, v. TURRILL. CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY, v. TURRILL. PITTSBURGH, FORT WAYNE, AND CHICAGO RAILWAY COMPANY, v. TURRILL.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 23, 1877.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued by Mr. George Gifford, Mr. John B. Niles, and Mr. George Payson, and submitted on printed argument by Mr. R. Biddle Roberts, for the appellants.

Mr. E.W. Stoughton, contra.

MR. JUSTICE STRONG delivered the opinion of the court.

These five cases may very conveniently be considered together, since they all present, in the main, the same questions.

The Cawood patent, for alleged infringements of which the suits were brought, has heretofore been the subject of consideration in this court, where it has been at least partially construed, and its limits have been defined. 1 Wall. 491. It is a patent "for an alleged new and useful improvement...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases