CHICAGO, ETC. R.R. CO. v. IOWA

Not in source.

94 U.S. 155 (1877)

24 L.Ed. 94

CHICAGO, BURLINGTON, AND QUINCY RAILROAD COMPANY v. IOWA.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 1, 1877.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. O.H. Browning and Mr. E.T. Frelinghuysen for the appellant.

Mr. M.E. Cutts, Attorney-General of Iowa, contra.


MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

Railroad companies are carriers for hire. They are incorporated as such, and given extraordinary powers, in order that they may the better serve the public in that capacity. They are, therefore, engaged in a public employment affecting the public interest, and, under the decision in Munn v. Illinois, supra, p. 113, subject to legislative control as to their rates of fare and freight, unless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases