1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 94 U.S.
  5. 94 U.S. 50 (1877)
 

DOYLE v. WISCONSIN

Not in source.

94 U.S. 50 (1877)

24 L.Ed. 64

DOYLE, v. WISCONSIN.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 29, 1877.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Argued, for the plaintiff in error, by Mr. William Allen Butler and Mr. I.C. Sloan, who cited Slaughter-House Cases, 10 Wall. 273; Telegraph Co. v. Eyser, 19 id. 419; Board of Commissioners v. Gorman, id. 661; Kitchen v. Randolph, 98 U.S. 86.

Mr. Charles W. Felker, contra.

MR. CHIEF JUSTICE WAITE delivered the opinion of the court.

The claim on the part of the plaintiff in error is, that as a writ of error to operate as a supersedeas might issue from this court to re-examine the judgment of the court below, a writ to carry the judgment into effect could not issue from the State court until the expiration of ten days after the rendition of the judgment. Whether this is so or not depends upon the effect to be given to that clause...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases