1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 85 U.S.
  5. 85 U.S. 642 (1873)
 

DANDELET v. SMITH

Not in source.

85 U.S. 642 (1873)

18 Wall. 642

21 L.Ed. 758

DANDELET, v. SMITH.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 27, 1873.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Messrs. G.C. Maunde and J.C. King, for the plaintiff in error:

Mr. G.H. Williams, Attorney-General, and Mr. S.F. Phillips, Solicitor-General, contra.

Mr. Justice BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The question in this case is whether the assessment for alleged deficiencies was or was not illegal.

1. It is contended by the plaintiff in error that the assessment is void upon its face, because not made month by month so as to indicate the deficiency for each month, and to make the reassessment coincide in time with the monthly returns of the plaintiff. It is sufficient to say that the law

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases