1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 81 U.S.
  5. 81 U.S. 484 (1872)
 

DIRST v. MORRIS

Not in source.

81 U.S. 484 (1872)

14 Wall. 484

20 L.Ed. 722

DIRST, v. MORRIS.

Supreme Court of United States.

November 11, 1872.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. S.W. Fuller, for the plaintiffs in error.

Messrs. Carlisle and McPherson (a brief of Mr. Thomas Dent being filed on the same side) contra.

Mr. Justice BRADLEY delivered the opinion of the court.

We think that there was no error in admitting in evidence the record of the foreclosure suit, whether Breese was served with the subpœna or not. If he was not served, and could show that fact, he was not bound by the decree. But the decree and sale formed a link in the plaintiff's chain of title from Russell, and at this stage of the cause the deed from Russell to Breese had not been given in evidence...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases