1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 62 U.S.
  5. 62 U.S. 266 (1859)
 

POORMAN ET AL. v. WOODWARD ET AL.

Not in source.

62 U.S. 266 (1859)

21 How. 266

16 L.Ed. 151

DANIEL POORMAN AND OTHERS v. WILLIAM A. WOODWARD AND WILLIAM C. DUSENBERRY, LATE PARTNERS UNDER THE FIRM OF WOODWARD & DUSENBERRY.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 21, 1859.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Stanbery for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Marbury for the defendants, upon which side there was also a brief filed by Mr. Smythe, which was adopted by Mr. Swayne.

Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

Hood and nine others, including the defendants, made a note of hand in Ohio, dated October 24th, 1849, for fifteen thousand dollars, payable to Woodward & Dusenberry thirty days after date, at their office in New York.

For himself, and as the agent of the other makers, Hood applied to the payees, Woodward & Dusenberry, for an advance of money on the note...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases