1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 62 U.S.
  5. 62 U.S. 146 (1859)
 

BARREDA ET AL. v. SILSBEE ET AL.

Not in source.

62 U.S. 146 (1859)

21 How. 146

16 L.Ed. 86

FREDERICK L. BARREDA AND PHILIP BARREDA, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. BENJAMIN H. SILSBEE, JOHN H. SILSBEE, BENJAMIN W. STONE, WILLIAM STONE, GEORGE T. SANDERS, AND WILLIAM D. PICKMAN.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 31, 1859.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Wallis and Mr. Nelson for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Brune and Mr. Johnson for the defendants in error.

Mr. Justice CLIFFORD delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before the court upon a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the district of Maryland. It is an action of indebitatus assumpsit, and was brought in the court below by the defendants in error, who were the original plaintiffs, to recover the freight earned by the ship Shirley on a charter of the ship made by the plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases