1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 59 U.S.
  5. 59 U.S. 380 (1856)
 

MECHANICS' AND TRADERS' BANK v. DEBOLT

Not in source.

59 U.S. 380 (1856)

18 How. 380

15 L.Ed. 458

THE MECHANICS' AND TRADERS' BANK, BRANCH OF THE STATE BANK OF OHIO, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. HENRY DEBOLT, LATE TREASURER OF HAMILTON COUNTY.

Supreme Court of United States.

April 29, 1856.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Stanberry, for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Pugh, for the defendant in error, considered that all the questions which arose in this case had been fully argued in the preceding case of Woolsey v. Dodge.

Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

Upon our examination of the agreed statement in this case, we find that it is ruled by the cases of The Piqua Branch of the State Bank of Ohio v. Knoop, 16 How. 369, and that of Dodge v. Woolsey, decided at this term. We therefore reverse the decree of the supreme court, and direct a mandate to issue accordingly.

Mr. Justice CATRON, Mr. Justice DANIEL, and Mr. Justice CAMPBELL...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases