1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 55 U.S.
  5. 55 U.S. 156 (1853)
 

LE ROY ET AL. v. TATHAM ET AL.

Not in source.

55 U.S. 156 (1853)

14 How. 156

14 L.Ed. 367

THOMAS OTIS LE ROY, AND DAVID SMITH, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. BENJAMIN TATHAM, JUNIOR, GEORGE N. TATHAM, AND HENRY B. TATHAM.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 10, 1853.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Gillett and Mr. Noyes, with whom was Mr. Barbour, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Mr. Cutting and Mr. Staples, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This is a case on error, from the Circuit Court of the Southern District of New York.

The action was brought in the Circuit Court, to recover damages for an alleged infringement of a patent for new and useful improvements in machinery for making pipes and tubes from metallic substances.

The declaration alleged that John and Charles Hanson, of England, were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases