1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 53 U.S.
  5. 53 U.S. 371 (1852)
 

SARGEANT ET AL. v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIANA

Not in source.

53 U.S. 371 (1852)

12 How. 371

13 L.Ed. 1028

PHINEAS O., NABBY, JABEZ AND BENJAMIN B. SARGEANT, HEIRS OF SAMUEL SARGEANT, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE STATE BANK OF INDIANA.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 2, 1852.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Upon these exceptions, the case came up to this court, and was argued by Mr. Smith for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. White for the defendant.

Mr. Smith for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. White, for defendant in error.

Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

The facts upon which this case is founded are to the effect following. The legislature of Indiana, having by a law bearing date on the 20th January, 1826, laid off and established the county of Tippecanoe in that State; by the same act appointed four commissioners for the purpose of selecting and establishing a seat of justice for the county thus created, in conformity...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases