1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 48 U.S.
  5. 48 U.S. 798 (1849)
 

BACKUS v. GOULD ET AL.

Not in source.

48 U.S. 798 (1849)

7 How. 798

12 L.Ed. 919

ELEAZER F. BACKUS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM GOULD AND DAVID BANKS, WHO SUE AS WELL FOR THE UNITED STATES AS THEMSELVES.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 6, 1849.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

They were all fully argued, by Mr. James Bayard and Mr. Joseph R. Ingersoll, for the plaintiff in error, and Mr. Wendell, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Wendell.

Mr. Justice McLEAN delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause is brought here by a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Northern District of New York.

An action of debt was brought by Gould and Banks to recover certain penalties alleged to have been incurred by the invasion of the copyright of the plaintiffs in twelve volumes of law reports, to wit, nine volumes of Cowen's Reports and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases