1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 48 U.S.
  5. 48 U.S. 260 (1849)
 

MATHESON ET AL v. THE BRANCH BANK OF MOBILE

Not in source.

48 U.S. 260 (1849)

7 How. 260

12 L.Ed. 692

MARIA MATHESON, JOHN DARRINGTON, ROBERT D. JAMES, BILLUPS GAYLE, JOHN GAYLE, AND EDWARD M. WARE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. THE BRANCH OF THE BANK OF THE STATE OF ALABAMA AT MOBILE, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 3, 1849.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Inge, counsel for the defendants in error, moved to dismiss the case for want of jurisdiction, apparent upon the record, which motion was resisted by Mr. Gayle, counsel for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

The record in this case is a very brief one. It states that a certificate was filed in the clerk's office of the Supreme Court of the State of Alabama, from the clerk of the Circuit Court for Mobile county, setting forth that a judgment had been obtained in that court by the bank against the plaintiffs in error for the sum of $10,573.82 and costs, from which judgment they had presented a writ of error to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases