1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 48 U.S.
  5. 48 U.S. 198 (1849)
 

SMITH ET AL. v. KERNOCHEN

Not in source.

48 U.S. 198 (1849)

7 How. 198

12 L.Ed. 666

JENNET SMITH, CALVIN S. POWE, AND THOMAS A. POWE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. JOSEPH KERNOCHEN.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 16, 1849.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Dargan, for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Sergeant, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Dargan, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Sergeant, for the defendant in error.

Mr. Justice NELSON, after reading the statement of the case prefixed to this report, proceeded to deliver the opinion of the court.

We are of opinion, that the charge of the court below upon the question of jurisdiction was substantially correct.

It might have been placed upon ground less open to objection. The case admits that Kernochen, the plaintiff, was not chargeable with notice of the motive of the company in...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases