1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 45 U.S.
  5. 45 U.S. 467 (1846)
 

ASPDEN ET AL. v. NIXON ET AL.

Not in source.

45 U.S. 467 (1846)

4 How. 467

11 L.Ed. 1059

ASPDEN AND OTHERS COMPLAINANTS, v. NIXON AND OTHERS, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 23, 26-28, 1846.

March 4, 1846.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The cause was argued by Mr. J. Hoffman and Mr. David Hoffman, with whom was Mr. Charles J. Ingersoll, for John Aspden of Lancashire, in support of the plea in bar, and by Mr. Reed and Mr. Williams, for Mrs. Poole and Mrs. Jones, and for John A. Brown, administrator of John Aspden of London, against the validity of the plea.

Mr. Williams, on the same side with Mr. Reed, and against the plea.

Mr. Justice CATRON (after having stated the facts of the case as they are recited in the commencement of this report) proceeded to deliver the opinion of the court.

We understand the true question submitted to this court to be, whether the decree dismissing the bill, made by the High Court of Chancery in England, bars and precludes John A. Brown, the Pennsylvania administrator of John Aspden of London, from prosecuting his...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases