1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 45 U.S.
  5. 45 U.S. 225 (1846)
 

AGRICULTURAL BANK OF MISSISSIPPI ET AL. v. RICE ET AL.

Not in source.

45 U.S. 225 (1846)

4 How. 225

11 L.Ed. 949

THE AGRICULTURAL BANK OF MISSISSIPPI AND OTHERS, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. CHARLES RICE AND MARY HIS WIFE, AND MARTHA PHIPPS, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 24, 1846.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

It was argued by Mr. Mason (Attorney-General), for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Thomas J. Johnston and Mr. Crittenden, for the defendants in error.

Mr. Mason, for the plaintiffs in error.

Mr. J.J. Johnston, for defendants in error.

Mr. Crittenden, on the same side.

Mr. Chief-Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

This being an action of ejectment, the only question between the parties is upon the legal title.

It is admitted in the exception, that Mary Rice and Martha Phipps, lessors of the plaintiff, were each of them, as heirs at law of Adam Bower, entitled to an undivided third part of the premises mentioned in the declaration, in fee simple. In order to show title...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases