1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 45 U.S.
  5. 45 U.S. 155 (1846)
 

STOCKTON ET AL. v. BISHOP

Not in source.

45 U.S. 155 (1846)

4 How. 155

11 L.Ed. 918

LUCIUS W. STOCKTON AND DANIEL MOORE, PLAINTIFFS IN ERROR, v. HARRIET BISHOP.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 28, 1846.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Bledsoe and Mr. Coxe for the plaintiffs in error, and Mr. Richard Biddle (in a printed argument), for the defendant in error.

Mr. Bledsoe for plaintiffs in error.

Mr. Justice CATRON delivered the opinion of the court.

This cause comes here by a writ of error to the Circuit Court of the District of Western Pennsylvania. There is no bill of exceptions in the record; although instructions said to have been given by the court to the jury are certified up as part of the proceedings. These of course we cannot notice. Other supposed errors are therefore relied on as sufficient to reverse the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases