1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 44 U.S.
  5. 44 U.S. 773 (1845)
 

THE UNITED STATES v. KING ET AL.

Not in source.

44 U.S. 773 (1845)

3 How. 773

11 L.Ed. 824

THE UNITED STATES, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. RICHARD KING AND DANIEL W. COXE, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 5, 1845.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Nelson, (attorney-general,) for the United States.

Coxe, for the defendants.

Coxe, for defendants,

Nelson, in reply and conclusion.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

This case is one of great importance, from the amount of property in dispute; and if the court entertained any doubt upon the questions of law or of fact which are presented by the record, we should regard it as our duty to hold it under advisement, and postpone the decision to another term. But the principles of law upon which it

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases