1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 44 U.S.
  5. 44 U.S. 266 (1845)
 

WHITE v. NICHOLLS ET AL.

Not in source.

44 U.S. 266 (1845)

3 How. 266

11 L.Ed. 591

ROBERT WHITE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM S. NICHOLLS, WILLIAM ROBINSON, OTHO M. LINTHICUM, EDWARD M. LINTHICUM, RAPHAEL SEMMES, PAUL STEVENS, AND CHARLES C. FULTON, DEFENDANTS IN ERROR. ROBERT WHITE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. HENRY ADDISON, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 11, 1845.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

May and R. Brent, for the plaintiff in error.

Bradley and Coxe, for the defendants in error.

May, for plaintiff in error.

Bradley, for defendants.

Coxe, on same side.

R.J. Brent, for plaintiff, in conclusion.

Mr. Justice DANIEL delivered the opinion of the court.

In the investigation of these cases it is deemed unnecessary to examine seriatim the five bills of exceptions sealed by the Circuit Court, and made parts of the record in each of them. The papers declared upon as libellous, and the instructions asked of the Circuit Court, are literally the same in both actions; the reasons, too, which influenced the decision of...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases