GORDON v. APPEAL TAX COURT

Not in source.

44 U.S. 133 (1845)

3 How. 133

11 L.Ed. 529

SAMUEL GORDON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE APPEAL TAX COURT. JAMES CHESTON, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. THE APPEAL TAX COURT.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 22, 1845.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Meredith and Dulany, for the plaintiffs in error.

Nelson, attorney-general, and Steele, for the defendants.

Dulany, for the plaintiffs in error,

Steele, for the defendants in error, contended.

Nelson, attorney-general,

Meredith, for plaintiffs in error,


Mr. Justice WAYNE delivered the opinion of the court.

The question raised in this case by the agreed statement of facts upon the record, is, Does the act of Maryland of 1841, chap. 23, so far as it imposes a tax upon the shares of stock held by stockholders in the Union Bank of Maryland and the other banks mentioned in the statement, impair the obligation of a contract?

The banks are classified in that statement as...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases