1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 44 U.S.
  5. 44 U.S. 106 (1845)
 

CURTIS v. MARTIN ET AL.

Not in source.

44 U.S. 106 (1845)

3 How. 106

11 L.Ed. 516

EDWARD CURTIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, v. WILLIAM MARTIN AND CHARLES A. COE, DEFENDANTS.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 15, 1845.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The facts in the case are clearly stated in the following brief of Mr. Nelson, attorney-general, who argued the case on behalf of Curtis, the plaintiff in error: —

Lord, for defendants in error.

Mr. Chief Justice TANEY delivered the opinion of the court.

This case comes before the court upon a writ of error directed to the Circuit Court for the southern district of New York. The action was brought by the defendants in error against the plaintiff, who was the collector of the port of New York, to recover back $4500, which had been paid, under protest, as duties upon certain goods imported into the port of New York, in April, 1841. The goods in question were...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases