1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 39 U.S.
  5. 39 U.S. 19 (1840)
 

THE BANK OF THE METROPOLIS v. GUTTSCHLICK

Not in source.

39 U.S. 19 (1840)

14 Pet. 19

10 L.Ed. 335

THE PRESIDENT AND DIRECTORS OF THE BANK OF THE METROPOLIS, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, vs. ERASTUS GUTTSCHLICK, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

January 21, 1840.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Coxe, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Messrs. Semmes and Bradley, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice BARBOUR delivered the opinion of the Court.

This was an action of assumpsit brought by the defendant in error against the plaintiff in error, in the Circuit Court of the United States, in the county of Washington, and District of Columbia.

The declaration contains three special counts, and a count for money had and received. The three special counts are all founded upon an agreement in writing, which, after...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases