1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 38 U.S.
  5. 38 U.S. 136 (1839)
 

WALLACE v. M`CONNELL

Not in source.

38 U.S. 136 (1839)

13 Pet. 136

10 L.Ed. 95

WILLIAM WALLACE, PLAINTIFF IN ERROR, vs. CORRY M`CONNELL, DEFENDANT IN ERROR.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 5, 1839.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Mr. Key, for the plaintiff in error; and by Mr. Crittenden, for the defendant.

Mr. Justice THOMPSON delivered the opinion of the Court. —

This case comes up on a writ of error from the District Court of the United States for the southern district of Alabama.

The action in the Court below was founded upon a note, which, although under seal, is considered in Tennessee a promissory note; and is in the words following:

"Three years and two months after date, I promise to pay Corry...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases