THE ARIADNE

Not in source.

15 U.S. 143 (1817)

2 Wheat. 143

4 L.Ed. 205

The ARIADNE. — Goddard et al. Claimants.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 14, 1817.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. G. Sullivan, for the appellants and claimants, offered to read farther proof, taken under the standing rule of the court, (25th rule, Feb. term, 1816.)

Mr. Woodward, and Mr. C.J. Ingersoll, for the captors.

Mr. Webster, for the appellants and claimants,


Mr. Justice WASHINGTON delivered the opinion of the court.

The view of the court is, that this case cannot be distinguished from those already decided. It is alleged that the flour was not actually destined to the use of the enemy; but whether any part of it went to his use or not, is immaterial. It is, indeed, possible that Cadiz might have fallen without the aid of these supplies; and therefore, in fact, Great Britain and...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases