KING v. RIDDLE

Not in source.

11 U.S. 168 (1812)

7 Cranch 168

3 L.Ed. 304

KING, v. RIDDLE.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 4, 1812.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.I. LEE, for the Plaintiff in error.

SWANN, contra.


MARSHALL, Ch. J. delivered the opinion of the court to the following effect:

In this case the whole evidence is spread upon the record by the bill of exceptions, and the Court below refused to instruct the jury (as requested by the Defendant) that it was not sufficient in law to enable the Plaintiff to recover in this action.

If the Court ought to have given this instruction, their refusal is certainly error.

The evidence shows that a note was given...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases