1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 11 U.S.
  5. 11 U.S. 152 (1812)
 

WELCH v. MANDEVILLE

Not in source.

11 U.S. 152 (1812)

7 Cranch 152

3 L.Ed. 299

WELCH, v. MANDEVILLE.

Supreme Court of United States.

March 5, 1812.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

E.I. LEE, for Plaintiff in error said that it had not been directly decided.

SWANN. contra.

E.I. LEE, in reply.

C. LEE, on the same side.

MARSHALL, Ch. Justice.

The majority of the Court is of opinion that the motion to re-instate the cause, was an application to the discretion of the Court, and its refusal is not a ground for a writ of error.

After the Court had delivered this opinion it became a question whether the writ of error should be dismissed, or the judgment affirmed.

After consideration of the case again,

On the 7th of March,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases