1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 9 U.S.
  5. 9 U.S. 34 (1809)
 

TUCKER v. OXLEY

Not in source.

9 U.S. 34 (1809)

5 Cranch 34

3 L.Ed. 29

JOHN AND JAMES TUCKER, v. OXLEY, ASSIGNEE OF T. MOORE, A BANKRUPT.

Supreme Court of United States.

February 15, 1809.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

C. Simms, for the plaintiff in error.

Jones, contra.

MARSHALL, Ch. J. delivered the opinion of the court, as follows:

In this case the plaintiffs in error, who were defendants in the circuit court, claimed to set off against a debt due from them to Thomas Moore, the bankrupt, a debt previously due to them from the firm of H. and T. Moore, which firm was dissolved, and the partnership fund had passed to T. Moore. This offset was not allowed; and its rejection is the error alleged...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases