1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 4 U.S.
  5. 4 U.S. 95 (1804)
 

LEA v. YARD

Not in source.

4 U.S. 95 (1804)

4 Dall. 95

1 L.Ed. 756

Lea, Executrix, et al. versus Yard. Hazlehurst et al. versus Dallas, Secretary of the Commonwealth.

High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.

January 1, 1804.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued on the 16th, 17th, 18th, and 19th of January 1804, by M. Levy, E. Tilghman, and Ingersoll, for the plaintiffs in error, and by Lewis, Rawle, S. Levy, and Dallas, for the defendants in error.

After deliberation, the COURT were, unanimously, of opinion, that the auctioneer's bond was intended, by law, for the benefit of his private customers, as well as for securing the duties payable to the government:

And, therefore, the judgments of the Supreme Court were affirmed; and the records remitted for further proceedings.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases