High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
January 17, 1800.
January 17, 1800.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
On arguing the cause in this Court, Lewis, for the plaintiff in error, took the following exceptions to the record:
The objections were answered by Rawle, for the defendants in error, to the following effect:
High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.
On the last day of the session, the COURT mentioned, that they had not been able to form a decisive and satisfactory opinion on the authorities and arguments in this cause; and that, therefore, they would keep it under advisement till the adjourned session. They added, that if the plaintiff in error was to be considered as restrained from pursuing the ordinary remedies of the law, and confined to the remedy prescribed in the report...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.