Ewing et Ux. Plaintiffs in Error,
versus
Houston et Ux.
High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
July 1, 1799.
July 1, 1799.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
For the plaintiff in error (who was also the plaintiff in the partition) Lewis made the following objections to the proceedings.
These objections were answered by Ingersoll and Hopkins, for the defendant in error, substantially as follows:
High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.
On the last day of the session, the COURT mentioned, that some doubts had arisen, which would prevent a decision of the cause till the adjourned session; but that, in the meantime, for their own information, they should direct a certiorari to issue to the Court of Common Pleas of York county, to inquire whether any precept had been given, authorising the writ of execution, or judicial writ of partition, to issue; and if...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting Sign on now to see your case. Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
Updated daily.
Uncompromising quality.
Complete, Accurate, Current.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full
text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the
full text of the citing case.