1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 4 U.S.
  5. 4 U.S. 47 (1799)
 

LUDLOW v. BINGHAM

Not in source.

4 U.S. 47 (1799)

4 Dall. 47

1 L.Ed. 736

Ludlow, Plaintiff in Error, versus Bingham.

High Court of Errors and Appeals, of Pennsylvania.

July 1, 1799.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Ingersoll and Dallas, for the plaintiff, and by Lewis and E. Tilghman, for the defendant.

For the defendant, E. Tilghman and Lewis*

Ingersoll, for the plaintiff in error, in reply.

After consideration the unanimous opinion of the COURT was delivered, by the Chief Justice, who, having stated the case, proceeded as follows:

M`KEAN, Chief Justice.

The first inquiry, which it is necessary to pursue, is, where was the note in controversy made, in Pennsylvania, or in New-York? For, whether the act of assembly, relating to promissory notes, is to be introduced, or excluded...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases