1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 4 U.S.
  5. 4 U.S. 37 (1800)
 

BAS v. TINGY

Not in source.

4 U.S. 37 (1800)

4 Dall. 37

1 L.Ed. 731

Bas, Plaintiff in Error, versus Tingy, Defendant in Error.

Supreme Court of United States.

August 15, 1800.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

The case was argued by Lewis, and E. Tilghman, for the plaintiff in error, and by Rawle, and W. Tilghman, for the defendant.

The JUDGES delivered their opinions seriatim in the following manner:

MOORE, Justice.

This case depends on the construction of the act, for the regulation of the navy. It is objected, indeed, that the act applies only to future wars; but its provisions are obviously applicable to the present situation of things, and there is nothing to prevent an immediate commencement of its operation.

It is, however...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases