The COURT, however, upon the authority of Hurst v. Fell, admitted the evidence, though with great reluctance; and declaring that they would reserve the point. But as the verdict was for the full amount of the plaintiff's demand, the question was not revived.
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
ZANTZINGER v. KETCH
Not in source.
4 U.S. 132 (1793)
4 Dall. 132
1 L.Ed. 772
Zantzinger, versus Ketch.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
April 1, 1793.
April 1, 1793.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.