1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. U.S.
  4. 135 U.S.
  5. 135 U.S. 701 (1889)
 

IN RE BROWN

Not in source.

135 U.S. 701 (1889)

10 S.Ct. 972

IN RE BROWN.

Supreme Court of United States.

October 1, 1889.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Daniel H. Chamberlain and Mr. William L. Royall, for plaintiff in error.

Mr. R.A. Ayers, Attorney General of the State of Virginia, and Mr. J. Randolph Tucker for defendant in error.

MR. JUSTICE BRADLEY, continuing delivered the opinion of the court.

The passage of a new statute of limitations, giving a shorter time for the bringing of actions than existed before, even as applied to actions which had accrued, does not necessarily affect the remedy to such an extent as to impair the obligation of the contract within the meaning of the Constitution, provided a...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases