1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. JOHNSON v. ARLOTTA
 

JOHNSON v. ARLOTTA

No. A11-630.

Ann Marie Johnson for herself and on behalf of John Youngs, petitioner, Respondent, v. Andrew John Arlotta, Appellant.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota.

Filed December 12, 2011.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Ann Johnson, Plymouth, Minnesota, pro se respondent.

Andrew S. Birrell, Steve Gaskins, Nicholas Rogers, Eric Newmark, Gaskins Bennett Birrell & Schupp, L.L.P., Minneapolis, Minnesota, for appellant.

Considered and decided by Larkin, Presiding Judge; Johnson, Chief Judge; and Bjorkman, Judge.

UNPUBLISHED OPINION

BJORKMAN, Judge.

Appellant challenges the district court's entry of a 51-year harassment restraining order (HRO) against him, contending that the district court erred in determining that his blogging and other speech constitutes harassment and that the HRO violates his constitutional rights. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in issuing the HRO but its duration exceeds the authorized limit, we affirm as modified....

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases