1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. Md.
  4. 274 Md.
  5. 274 Md. 708 (1975)
 

ESPOSITO v. MD. AUTO. INS. FUND

[No. 165, September Term, 1974.]

274 Md. 708 (1975)

337 A.2d 411

ESPOSITO, ETC. ET AL. v. MARYLAND AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE FUND

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 12, 1975.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph L. Johnson, with whom were Samuel D. Hill and White, Mindel, Clarke & Hill and Forrest R. Gabler on the brief, for appellants.

William E. Brannan, with whom were Robert J. Ryan and Moore, Hennegan, Brannan & Carney on the brief, for appellee.

The cause was argued before SINGLEY, SMITH, DIGGES, LEVINE and O'DONNELL, JJ.

DIGGES, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.

In order to qualify to sue the Maryland Automobile Insurance Fund a claimant must comply with the requirements set forth in what is now codified as Maryland Code (1957, 1972 Repl. Vol., 1974 Cum. Supp.) Art. 48A, § 243H.1 One such requisite is that the individual who desires to sue the fund must demonstrate that he has made "all reasonable efforts" to ascertain the identity of the vehicle...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases