1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.
  4. 327 F.Supp.
  5. 327 F.Supp. 1051 (1971)
 

BUCKLEY v. VIDAL

No. 69 Civ. 1933.

327 F.Supp. 1051 (1971)

William F. BUCKLEY, Jr., Plaintiff, v. Gore VIDAL, Defendant.

United States District Court, S. D. New York.

May 13, 1971.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Hellerstein, Rosier & Rembar, New York City, for plaintiff; Charles Rembar, Stephen F. Rohde, New York City, of counsel.

Fitelson & Mayers, New York City, for defendant; Harold J. Sherman, New York City, of counsel.

OPINION

LEVET, District Judge.

This is a motion by plaintiff, pursuant to Rule 56, F.R.Civ.P. seeking summary judgment dismissing each of defendant's four counterclaims on the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that plaintiff is entitled to judgment as a matter of law.

The gravamen of each counterclaim is an alleged defamation by Buckley of Vidal. The first three counterclaims all have to do with Buckley's comments...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases