1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.Supp.3d
  4. 39 F.Supp.3d
  5. 39 F.Supp.3d 656 (2014)
 

U.S. EX REL. BARTLETT v. ASHCROFT

Civil Action No. 3:04-57.

39 F.Supp.3d 656 (2014)

UNITED STATES of America ex rel.; Thomas BARTLETT; and Kimberly Gummo, Plaintiffs, v. Daniel ASHCROFT; Tri-County Imaging Associates, Inc.; Carlos A. Weigering; Ramesh Agarwal; Urmila Chopra, as Executrix of the Estate of Ramesh Chopra; and Raj Kansel, Defendants.

United States District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania.

Filed August 21, 2014.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Andrew M. Stone , Stone Law Firm, LLC, Paul E. Skirtich , United States Attorney's Office, Pittsburgh, PA, Gregory M. Simpson , Simpson Law Firm, Fayetteville, GA, for Plaintiffs.

Michael J. Parrish, Jr. , Ronald P. Carnevali, Jr. , Spence, Custer, Saylor, Wolfe & Rose, Johnstown, PA, for Defendants.

MEMORANDUM OPINION

I. Introduction

This qui tam action is before the Court on cross motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff-Relators Thomas Bartlett and Kimberly Gummo ("Relators") have alleged that various healthcare providers and related individuals were complicit in a scheme to...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases